MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4392116727 · doi:10.1017/9781805430162.025

Jeremy Gibson, Banbury and the Origins of the Coventry to Oxford Canal, 1768–1778; Barrie Trinder, The Midlands Canals in 1871: The Evidence of Census

2022· other· en· W4392116727 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fabian Hiscock

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmerican Environmental and Regional History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCensusHistoryArchaeologyDemographySociologyPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

These two publications will interest historians of Oxfordshire for their provision of source material about the Oxford Canal – the historical county's only canal – at widely different times. Jeremy Gibson's booklet documents the canal's origins and the first phase of its construction from Longford in Warwickshire (on the Coventry Canal) to Banbury. The opening of this section in 1778 is regarded by Gibson as having been the most important event for Banbury in the whole of the eighteenth century. The booklet highlights the role of Sir Roger Newdigate (1791–1806), a major Midland coal producer and promoter of several canals including both the Oxford and the Coventry which met near some of his pits. Gibson draws on Newdigate’s diaries and on Jackson's Oxford Journal from 1768 to 1778 to tell the Oxford Canal's early story. Acknowledging earlier histories, notably The Oxford Canal (1976) by the late Hugh Compton (to whom the booklet is dedicated), the publication is well presented and illustrated, and is fully referenced and name-indexed – in all, a commendable work of local history. The only disappointment is its end-point. By not pursuing the history of the canal to 1789, when it was linked to the Thames near Oxford, the author stops short of considering the impact on Banbury of the establishment of connections with Oxford and London. The booklet's contents have also been published in Gibson's Banbury's People in the Eighteenth Century (2019), though dispersed amongst other material (see Oxoniensia , vol. 85, 2020, pp. 300–1). Barrie Trinder's book is quite different in style, scope and content. Its author is one of our pre-eminent industrial historians, and Midlands Canals is just the latest of numerous books, many of which reflect his life-long interest in the canals. It puts into practice his idea of using census evidence to ‘illuminate’ the history of waterways, which originated in a paper on the Oxford Canal prepared for the Banbury Historical Society. During a spell of ill-health he managed to transcribe a great deal of data from the 1871 national census relating to various Midland canals (p. viii). The eventual result is much more than a presentation of census data. Trinder opens with a general review of the origins and chronology of the canals, before outlining questions he intends to address and reviewing the existing literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.578
Threshold uncertainty score0.849

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0100.012
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAmerican Environmental and Regional History→French-language works237,207→