MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392119575 · doi:10.1016/j.epsr.2024.110224

Data-driven distributionally robust optimization approach for the coordinated dispatching of the power system considering the correlation of wind power

2024· article· en· W4392119575 on OpenAlexaff
Hengzhen Wang, Zhongkai Yi, Ying Xu, Qinqin Cai, Zhimin Li, Hongwei Wang, Xuechen Bai

Bibliographic record

VenueElectric Power Systems Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Power System Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersScience and Technology Project of State Grid
KeywordsWind powerPower (physics)Electric power systemCorrelationComputer scienceMathematical optimizationControl theory (sociology)EngineeringMathematicsElectrical engineeringArtificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the increasing penetration of large-scale wind power into the power grid, it is crucial to develop a precise model to accurately depict the stochasticity and correlation among wind farm outputs, which is highly important for ensuring the safe and efficient utilization of wind energy in grid dispatching. In this article, a data-driven distributionally robust optimization (DDRO) dispatching approach that accounts for spatial correlations among outputs from multiple wind farms is proposed. The proposed approach is applied to a source-network-load-storage grid system to ascertain unit start-stop schedules and resource allocation effectively. First, a truncated spatial correlation model is proposed, enabling a comprehensive representation of spatial correlations and output constraints between distinct wind farms . Second, the ISODATA clustering algorithm is employed to generate typical scenarios, reduce model complexity, and expedite the computation process. Third, a unit commitment model considering the demand response is constructed and solved using the DDRO approach. Finally, the proposed model is applied to the IEEE 30-bus system to test its robustness and cost-effectiveness compared to the traditional robust optimization model. Additionally, it is applied to the IEEE 118-bus system to demonstrate its scalability and stability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectric Power Systems ResearchSame topicElectric Power System OptimizationFrench-language works237,207