Missense variants in phospholamban and cardiac myosin binding protein identified in patients with a family history and clinical diagnosis of dilated cardiomyopathy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As the genetic landscape of cardiomyopathies continues to expand, the identification of missense variants in disease-associated genes frequently leads to a classification of variant of uncertain significance (VUS). For the proper reclassification of such variants, functional characterization is an important contributor to the proper assessment of pathogenic potential. Several missense variants in the calcium transport regulatory protein phospholamban have been associated with dilated cardiomyopathy. However, >40 missense variants in this transmembrane peptide are currently known and most remain classified as VUS with little clinical information. Similarly, missense variants in cardiac myosin binding protein have been associated with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. However, hundreds of variants are known and many have low penetrance and are often found in control populations. Herein, we focused on novel missense variants in phospholamban, an Ala15-Thr variant found in a 4-year-old female and a Pro21-Thr variant found in a 60-year-old female, both with a family history and clinical diagnosis of dilated cardiomyopathy. The patients also harbored a Val896-Met variant in cardiac myosin binding protein. The phospholamban variants caused defects in the function, phosphorylation, and dephosphorylation of this calcium transport regulatory peptide, and we classified these variants as potentially pathogenic. The variant in cardiac myosin binding protein alters the structure of the protein. While this variant has been classified as benign, it has the potential to be a low-risk susceptibility variant because of the structural change in cardiac myosin binding protein. Our studies provide new biochemical evidence for missense variants previously classified as benign or VUS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".