MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392146571 · doi:10.1002/rse2.384

A hierarchical, multi‐sensor framework for peatland sub‐class and vegetation mapping throughout the Canadian boreal forest

2024· article· en· W4392146571 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Nicholas Pontone, Koreen Millard, Dan K. Thompson, Luc Guindon, André Beaudoin

Bibliographic record

VenueRemote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPeatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Canadian institutionsCanadian Forest ServiceNatural Resources CanadaCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Space AgencyWeston Family FoundationU.S. Geological SurveyNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsPeatTaigaBorealVegetation (pathology)Remote sensingPhysical geographyEnvironmental scienceGeographyForestryEcologyBiologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Peatlands in the Canadian boreal forest are being negatively impacted by anthropogenic climate change, the effects of which are expected to worsen. Peatland types and sub‐classes vary in their ecohydrological characteristics and are expected to have different responses to climate change. Large‐scale modelling frameworks such as the Canadian Model for Peatlands, the Canadian Fire Behaviour Prediction System and the Canadian Land Data Assimilation System require peatland maps including information on sub‐types and vegetation as critical inputs. Additionally, peatland class and vegetation height are critical variables for wildlife habitat management and are related to the carbon cycle and wildfire fuel loading. This research aimed to create a map of peatland sub‐classes (bog, poor fen, rich fen permafrost peat complex) for the Canadian boreal forest and create an inventory of peatland vegetation height characteristics using ICESat‐2. A three‐stage hierarchical classification framework was developed to map peatland sub‐classes within the Canadian boreal forest circa 2020. Training and validation data consisted of peatland locations derived from various sources (field data, aerial photo interpretation, measurements documented in literature). A combination of multispectral data, L‐band SAR backscatter and C‐Band interferometric SAR coherence, forest structure and ancillary variables was used as model predictors. Ancillary data were used to mask agricultural areas and urban regions and account for regions that may exhibit permafrost. In the first stage of the classification, wetlands, uplands and water were classified with 86.5% accuracy. In the second stage, within the wetland areas only, peatland and mineral wetlands were differentiated with 93.3% accuracy. In the third stage, constrained to only the peatland areas, bogs, rich fens, poor fens and permafrost peat complexes were classified with 71.5% accuracy. Then, ICESat‐2 ATL08 spaceborne lidar data were used to describe regional variations in peatland vegetation height characteristics and regional and class‐wise variations based on a boreal forest wide sample. This research introduced a comprehensive large‐scale peatland sub‐class mapping framework for the Canadian boreal forest, presenting the first moderate resolution map of its kind.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score0.191

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRemote Sensing in Ecology and ConservationSame topicPeatlands and Wetlands EcologyFrench-language works237,207