MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

RLC: A Reinforcement Learning Based Charging Scheme for Battery Swap Stations

2023· article· en· W4392152408 on OpenAlexaff
Yutao Xu, Qiang Ye, Yujie Tang, Hui Huang, Kamran Sattar Awaisi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReinforcement learningSwap (finance)Computer scienceRLC circuitScheme (mathematics)Battery (electricity)Electrical engineeringEngineeringVoltageArtificial intelligenceCapacitorBusinessPhysicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the past decade, the Electric Vehicle (EV) market has witnessed remarkable expansion. Nevertheless, apprehensions regarding prolonged charging durations frequently contribute to range anxiety. Battery Swap Station (BSS) is a promising solution to the range anxiety problem. Typically, when an EV arrives at a BSS, the depleted battery in the EV is replaced with a fully charged one, then the depleted battery is charged at the maximum speed. In this paper, we propose a novel battery swapping/charging scheme for BSS, Reinforcement Learning based Charging (RLC), to serve as many EVs as possible and minimize the total electricity cost. Specifically, with RLC, for the EVs that do not need full batteries, partially charged ones will be provided. To reduce the electricity cost whenever possible, RLC tries to shift the charging time of a battery to a low-electricity-price period. Technically, RLC uses Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (DDPG), a Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) algorithm, to optimize the charging strategy for the batteries in BSS. Our experimental results indicate that RLC outperforms the existing charging/swapping schemes in terms of battery service rate and total electricity cost.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207