Leveraging Graph Theory for Efficient Cache Policy Design in $360^{\circ}$ Video Streaming
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Immersive systems and <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$360^{\circ}$</tex> video have grown in popularity in recent years. Nevertheless, due to the high bandwidth needs and massive size of these videos, streaming them presents an important issue. A possible solution to this problem is to employ edge caching, which keeps a portion of the video closer to the viewer to reduce latency and assure a higher Quality of Experience (QoE). In this paper, we present a caching policy approach for <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$360^{\circ}$</tex> video streaming that employs a tile-based graph representation of videos. Our method focuses on finding the most relevant tiles for caching. The suggested solution is intended to work efficiently for many videos competing for a single cache, ensuring that the most relevant tiles are cached to maximize performance. It exhibits robustness even in scenarios with a limited number of users, while still being able to effectively handle a vast amount of videos. Our technique can adapt to different video content and user needs by using the graph structure of the videos, making it a flexible and scalable solution for cache management in video streaming. Performance evaluation demonstrate the effectiveness of our method that outperforms existing caching strategies in terms of Cache Hit Ratio (CHR).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".