MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Leveraging Graph Theory for Efficient Cache Policy Design in $360^{\circ}$ Video Streaming

2023· article· en· W4392153185 on OpenAlexaff
Ahmed Saadallah, Philippe Brunet, Inès El-Korbi, Sidi‐Mohammed Senouci, Soumaya Cherkaoui

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCaching and Content Delivery
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCacheCPU cacheGraph theoryVideo streamingParallel computingTheoretical computer scienceComputer networkMathematicsCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Immersive systems and$360^{\circ}$video have grown in popularity in recent years. Nevertheless, due to the high bandwidth needs and massive size of these videos, streaming them presents an important issue. A possible solution to this problem is to employ edge caching, which keeps a portion of the video closer to the viewer to reduce latency and assure a higher Quality of Experience (QoE). In this paper, we present a caching policy approach for$360^{\circ}$video streaming that employs a tile-based graph representation of videos. Our method focuses on finding the most relevant tiles for caching. The suggested solution is intended to work efficiently for many videos competing for a single cache, ensuring that the most relevant tiles are cached to maximize performance. It exhibits robustness even in scenarios with a limited number of users, while still being able to effectively handle a vast amount of videos. Our technique can adapt to different video content and user needs by using the graph structure of the videos, making it a flexible and scalable solution for cache management in video streaming. Performance evaluation demonstrate the effectiveness of our method that outperforms existing caching strategies in terms of Cache Hit Ratio (CHR).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCaching and Content DeliveryFrench-language works237,207