MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Robust Deep Joint Source Channel Coding with Time-Varying Noise

2023· article· en· W4392158327 on OpenAlexaff
Weida Wang, Xinchun Yu, Xinyi Tong, Runpeng Yu, Xiao–Ping Zhang, Shao‐Lun Huang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Communication Security Techniques
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of China
KeywordsComputer scienceJoint (building)Coding (social sciences)Channel codeNoise (video)Decoding methodsSpeech recognitionTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligenceEngineeringMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deep Joint Source-Channel Coding (JSCC) has gained increased attention, asserting its significance in the communication field. However, existing Deep JSCC techniques struggle to mitigate time-varying noise due to the deep neural networks being trained beforehand and fixed. To address this issue, we propose a robust deep JSCC scheme. Firstly, a multi-network parallel structure, as well as error-correcting codes, is introduced to effectively exploit label information. Secondly, a closed-form linear encoder and decoder pair is employed at the input and output ends of the channel to deal with the varying noise, which releases the neural network from dealing with a large range of varying noise levels. Thirdly, a transfer learning algorithm is utilized for estimating real-time noise statistics, which outperforms conventional estimation methods when noise statistics are time-dependent. These three components are effectively integrated as a comprehensive transmission system. Experimental results demonstrate that our optimized scheme outperforms existing approaches in the literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Communication Security TechniquesFrench-language works237,207