MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4392182954 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.043049

Probing more deeply in an all-sky search for continuous gravitational waves in the LIGO O3 data set

2024· article· en· W4392182954 on OpenAlexfundno aff
A. Tripathee, K. Riles

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceNational Research Foundation of KoreaAustralian Research CouncilScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNational Science and Technology CouncilMinistry of Science and ICT, South KoreaCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueInstituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareMax-Planck-GesellschaftAcademia SinicaSimon Fraser UniversityMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsLIGOPhysicsGravitational wavePolarization (electrochemistry)PopulationAstrophysicsAmplitudeNeutron starOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report results from an all-sky search of the LIGO data from the third LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA run (O3) for continuous gravitational waves from isolated neutron stars in the frequency band [30, 150] Hz and spindown range of $[\ensuremath{-}1\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}8},+1\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}9}]\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{Hz}/\mathrm{s}$. This search builds upon a previous analysis of the first half of the O3 data using the same powerflux pipeline. We search more deeply here by using the full O3 data and by using loose coherence in the initial stage with fully coherent combination of LIGO Hanford (H1) and LIGO Livingston (L1) data, while limiting the frequency band searched and excluding narrow, highly disturbed spectral bands. We detect no signal and set strict frequentist upper limits on circularly polarized and on linearly polarized wave amplitudes, in addition to estimating population-averaged upper limits. The lowest upper limit obtained for circular polarization is $\ensuremath{\sim}4.5\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}26}$, and the lowest linear polarization limit is $\ensuremath{\sim}1.3\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}25}$ (both near 144 Hz). The lowest estimated population-averaged upper limit is $\ensuremath{\sim}1.0\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}25}$. In the frequency band and spindown range searched here, these limits improve upon the O3a powerflux search by a median factor of $\ensuremath{\sim}1.4$ and upon the best previous limits obtained for the full O3 data by a median factor of $\ensuremath{\sim}1.1$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.530
Teacher spread0.469 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D.→Same topicPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research→French-language works237,207→