Conformational Landscape of α-Halopropiophenones Determined by <sup><i>n</i></sup><i>J</i><sub>C–H</sub> NMR Reveals Unexpected Patterns and Geometric Constraints
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The conformational features of α-halopropiophenones were investigated to understand the influence of α-halogens on conformation through hyperconjugative interactions, electrostatics, and steric factors. Using NMR, C–H scalar coupling constants were measured in different solvents, revealing a pattern in the conformational equilibria, which we validated by computational means. This behavior arises largely from hyperconjugative effects with the exception of the fluoro-derivatives, which are also influenced by steric and electrostatic interactions. In all cases, the contribution to hyperconjugation of the α-halo ketones is driven by the oxygen lone pair (rather than the C–X bond), which donates electron density to the adjacent C–C bonds. Additionally, C–C α bond rotation generates distortions in the side chain, responsible for destabilization, thus affecting system conjugation. These structural features identified for the α-halo ketones are also reflected in their reactivity, which is distinct from that expected for nucleophilic addition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".