MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392187219 · doi:10.2523/iptc-23737-ea

Enhancing Safety in Geological Carbon Sequestration: Supervised Machine Learning for Early Detection and Mitigation of CO2 Leakage in Injection Wells

2024· article· en· W4392187219 on OpenAlex
Saeed Harati, Sina Rezaei Gomari, Mohammad Azizur Rahman, Rashid Hassan, Ibrahim Hassan, Ahmad K. Sleiti, Matthew Hamilton

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Petroleum Technology Conference · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeakage (economics)Carbon sequestrationEnvironmental scienceLeak detectionComputer sciencePetroleum engineeringEngineeringCarbon dioxideEnvironmental engineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The efficient and safe operation of CO2 injection wells during geological sequestration is crucial for successful carbon capture and storage (CCS) projects. This study explores the application of machine learning in creating a data-driven model for simultaneous prediction of the location and size of potential leak incidents along an active CO2 injection well based on wellhead and bottom-hole pressure and temperature data. Five different well-established machine learning algorithms were selected for predictive model development, including Support Vector Regression (SVR), K-Nearest Neighbor Regression (KNNR), Decision Tree Regression (DTR), Random Forest Regression (RFR), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN). A series of numerical simulations were performed to create a dataset based on a CO2 injection well model in a southern North Sea saline aquifer reservoir, accounting for various leak scenarios with different locations and sizes. The dataset includes three input features of wellhead pressure, bottom-hole pressure, and bottom-hole temperature, paired with two output variables of leak location and leak size. The research findings demonstrate that all models perform well in effectively pinpointing leak locations, but they face difficulties when it comes to detecting small leaks, particularly those with a CO2 leakage rate below 0.01 kg/s. The results obtained indicated that, with regard to model performance, the SVR and KNNR models tended to outperform the others during the testing phase. More precisely, the SVR model demonstrated exceptional performance in the context of leak localization, particularly when dealing with smaller datasets. Conversely, KNNR consistently showcased superior performance in the detection of leak size, regardless of the dataset size. The outcomes of this research can provide valuable insights into the behavior of leaky CO2 injection wells during geological sequestration and highlight the efficacy of supervised machine learning in detecting and predicting leakage in CO2 injection wells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.332
Threshold uncertainty score0.496

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it