MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392191280 · doi:10.18280/mmep.110220

Generalized Quadratic Functional Equation and Its Stability over Non-Archimedean Normed Space

2024· article· en· W4392191280 on OpenAlex
A. Ramachandran, S. Sangeetha

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicFunctional Equations Stability Results
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsQuadratic equationStability (learning theory)Functional equationNormed vector spacePure mathematicsSpace (punctuation)Mathematical analysisPartial differential equationComputer scienceGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A functional equation is one of the most important and fascinating areas of mathematics, which involves simple algebraic manipulations and can lead to a variety of interesting results.In recent decades, numerous authors have studied different types of functional equation and its stability, such as Hyers-Ulam Stability, Hyers-Ulam-Rassias Stability, and generalized Hyers-Ulam Stability.The stability of functional equations and mixedtype functional equations has been extensively explored by numerous researchers across various spaces, yielding intriguing results primarily in the classical (Archimedean) setting.In recent years, attention has shifted towards investigating the Hyers-Ulam stability (HUS) of generalized Quadratic functional equations in non-Archimedean normed spaces.This article demonstrates the Hyers-Ulam Stability (HUS) of Quadratic functional equations.(3 -) + ( + 3) = 10() + 10(), ( -) + ( + ) = ( 2 + 1)() + ( 2 + 1)(), for any integer ≠ 0, in NAN space by using the direct method.Also, we have given some suitable counterexamples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.567
Threshold uncertainty score0.918

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it