MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392194197 · doi:10.5539/cis.v17n1p9

On Preventing and Mitigating Cache Based Side-Channel Attacks on AES System in Virtualized Environments

2024· article· en· W4392194197 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Abdullah Albalawi

Bibliographic record

VenueComputer and Information Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSecurity and Verification in Computing
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersShaqra University
KeywordsComputer scienceCacheSide channel attackChannel (broadcasting)Embedded systemComputer securityOperating systemComputer networkCryptography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cloud computing aims to cut costs through a reduction in spending on equipment, infrastructure, and software by applying the multi-tenancy feature. Despite all the benefits of multi-tenancy, it is still a source of risk in cloud computing. Cloud adoption may be hampered by security concerns if suitable cloud-based security solutions are not available. Moreover, virtualization that enables multi-tenancy, considered one of the main components of a cloud, introduces major security risks and does not offer appropriate isolation between different instances running on the same physical machine. In this paper, we present a preliminary idea that may support the development of new countermeasures for a particular type of threat, namely cache-based side-channel attacks that target cache memories in virtualized environments. Attackers specifically target virtual machines in this type of attack to create many side channels and gather sensitive data. Additionally, this research offers preliminary concepts to aid in developing of solutions or defenses that enable us to identify unusual activity that could point to attacks associated with multi-tenancy, as well as security measures that preserve the benefits of multi-tenancy while lowering security concerns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputer and Information ScienceSame topicSecurity and Verification in ComputingFrench-language works237,207