Assessment of Soil-Structure Interaction Effects on Seismic Behavior of Isolator and Mass Damper Equipped Buildings
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study examines the impact of Soil-Structure Interaction (SSI) on the response of seismic-isolated buildings.Reinforced concrete office buildings with different heights are studied.The High Damping Rubber Bearing (HDRB), Lead Rubber Bearing (LRB) and Double Sliding Pendulum (DSP) isolators are utilized to isolate the buildings base.Also, Tunned Mass Damper (TMD) is implemented at top of buildings to improve building response.Soft, medium and hard soils are modelled using direct and substructure approaches.On the other hand, the influence of foundation type on buildings response is examined.The results indicate that considering SSI in soft soil reduces base shear of 6-storey building by 30%, but increases top storey displacement from 128 mm to 182 mm.It is found that base isolators are more efficient in reducing base shear (41-66%) than TMD (10-25%).Simple equations are suggested to calculate the fundamental period based on building height.The soil layer near the foundation, around 75% of the building height, primarily determines the building's response.Therefore, soil investigation can be restricted to a maximum depth of 75% of the building height.Finally, it is found that using pile foundation in soft soil alters building response to resemble that in hard soil conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it