MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392200114 · doi:10.55908/sdgs.v12i2.1582

TRANSFORMING CLASSROOM DISCOURSE THROUGH DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT IN COLOMBIA

2024· article· en· W4392200114 on OpenAlex
Marisela Restrepo Ruíz, Liliana Patricia Álvarez Ruíz, Ligia Rosa Martínez Bula, Mónica Isabel Herazo Chamorro, Aura E. Ganem Luna

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Law and Sustainable Development · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEducational and Psychological Assessments
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDynamic assessmentSociologyPolitical scienceLinguisticsPsychologyDevelopmental psychologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: The study examines the impact of Dynamic Assessment (DA) on teachers' practices in a sixth-grade classroom at Institución Educativa la Normal Superior in Montería, Colombia, focusing on language use, duration, and challenges in group contexts. Theoretical Framework: The study uses educational psychology principles to analyze Dynamic Assessment, focusing on sociocultural theory, Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD), constructivism, and dialogical assessment. It emphasizes collaborative interactions, active engagement, and feedback for student learning. The study aims to examine Dynamic Assessment's effectiveness in promoting student development and learning, based on these theoretical perspectives. Design Methodology Approach: The study uses a mixed-methods approach to investigate the impact of Dynamic Assessment (DA) on teachers' practices. It uses a longitudinal design, spanning three stages before, during, and after DA implementation. Data is collected through observations, video recordings, and interviews. The study adheres to ethical guidelines and uses triangulation to enhance validity. While limitations exist, the study aims to contribute to existing literature on assessment and instructional methodologies. Findings: The study found significant changes in teachers' practices following the implementation of Dynamic Assessment (DA). Teachers used more scaffolding and prompting strategies, adapted their language to students' needs, and fostered a more interactive learning environment. Interaction duration increased significantly, allowing for more in-depth discussions. Teachers reported increased confidence in using DA strategies and emphasized the importance of professional development. However, challenges like managing time constraints and balancing assessment with instructional goals remained. Research, Practical and Social Implications: The study on Dynamic Assessment (DA) in education has significant practical and social implications. It suggests that DA can enhance teaching practices, improve student learning outcomes, promote equity and inclusion, and provide professional development opportunities. Policymakers should consider integrating DA principles into curriculum development and teacher training programs. Further research is needed to explore DA's long-term effects and its potential synergies with other pedagogical approaches. Collaboration between educators, researchers, and community stakeholders can foster more effective learning environments. Originality/Value: The study explores the impact of Dynamic Assessment (DA) on teachers' practices in a Colombian sixth-grade classroom. It uses a mixed-methods approach, examining changes in discourse, interaction patterns, and instructional strategies before and after DA implementation. The research identifies challenges and offers practical implications for educators, emphasizing scaffolding techniques and personalized feedback. It contributes to educational theory and practice by expanding understanding of DA's influence on teaching practices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.891
Threshold uncertainty score0.445

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.368 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it