MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392201060 · doi:10.1101/2024.02.21.581489

Repolarisation-relaxation dyscoupling and TRPA1 activation permit systolic mechano-arrhythmogenesis

2024· preprint· en· W4392201060 on OpenAlexaff
Breanne A. Cameron, Matthew R. Stoyek, Joachim Greiner, Rémi Peyronnet, Peter Köhl, T. Alexander Quinn

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicIon Channels and Receptors
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRyanodine receptorDiastoleInternal medicineChemistryCardiologyBiophysicsMembrane potentialSarcomereAcidosisCalciumMyocyteMedicineBiochemistryBiologyBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Background The heart’s mechanical state feeds back to its electrical activity, potentially contributing to arrhythmias (mechano-arrhythmogenesis, MAR). MAR has been mechanistically explained during electrical diastole, when cardiomyocytes are at their resting membrane potential. Conversely, during electrical systole, cardiomyocytes appear to be protected from MAR, even as membrane potential and cytosolic calcium concentration ([Ca 2+ ] i ) are simultaneously restored to resting levels during repolarisation (repolarisation-relaxation coupling, RRC). Yet, systolic MAR has been reported in ischaemic myocardium, with unclear underlying mechanisms. Methods Rabbit left ventricular cardiomyocytes were electrically paced and exposed to a simulated ischaemia solution (including hyperkalaemia, acidosis, and block of oxidative phosphorylation) or pinacidil (to simulate ischaemia-induced opening of ATP-sensitive potassium [K ATP ] channels), with or without glibenclamide (to block K ATP channels). RRC was assessed by simultaneous measurement of membrane voltage and [Ca 2+ ] i dynamics with fluorescence imaging. Acute stretch at increasing magnitudes was applied using carbon fibres, with stretch timed to diastole or late systole. Stretch mechanics and the incidence of MAR was assessed by video-based measurement of sarcomere length. Mechanisms contributing to MAR were assessed by buffering [Ca 2+ ] i (BAPTA-AM), stabilising ryanodine receptors (dantrolene), non-specifically blocking mechano-sensitive channels (streptomycin), activating (AITC) or blocking (HC-030031) transient receptor potential kinase ankyrin 1 channels (TRPA1), or chelating (NAC) or blocking production of (DPI) reactive oxygen species (ROS). Results It was reconfirmed that MAR during physiological RRC is rare, while ischaemia- or pharmacologically-induced RRC dyscoupling generates a vulnerable period for systolic MAR. This systolic MAR depends on TRPA1, [Ca 2+ ] i , and ROS, which contribute to stretch-induced excitation and arrhythmia sustenance. An increase in systolic MAR can be prevented by mitigating RRC dyscoupling with K ATP channel block, or by blocking TRPA1, buffering [Ca 2+ ] i , or reducing ROS. Conclusion RRC dyscoupling may be arrhythmogenic in ischaemia and other pathologies associated with systolic MAR, and TRPA1 may be a novel anti-arrhythmic target.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicIon Channels and ReceptorsFrench-language works237,207