Hydrogen peroxide sensitivity connects the activity of <scp> <i>COX5A</i> </scp> and <scp> <i>NPR3</i> </scp> to the regulation of <scp> <i>YAP1</i> </scp> expression
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are among the most severe types of cellular stressors with the ability to damage essential cellular biomolecules. Excess levels of ROS are correlated with multiple pathophysiological conditions including neurodegeneration, diabetes, atherosclerosis, and cancer. Failure to regulate the severely imbalanced levels of ROS can ultimately lead to cell death, highlighting the importance of investigating the molecular mechanisms involved in the detoxification procedures that counteract the effects of these compounds in living organisms. One of the most abundant forms of ROS is H 2 O 2 , mainly produced by the electron transport chain in the mitochondria. Numerous genes have been identified as essential to the process of cellular detoxification. Yeast YAP1 , which is homologous to mammalian AP‐1 type transcriptional factors, has a key role in oxidative detoxification by upregulating the expression of antioxidant genes in yeast. The current study reveals novel functions for COX5A and NPR3 in H 2 O 2 ‐induced stress by demonstrating that their deletions result in a sensitive phenotype. Our follow‐up investigations indicate that COX5A and NPR3 regulate the expression of YAP1 through an alternative mode of translation initiation. These novel gene functions expand our understanding of the regulation of gene expression and defense mechanism of yeast against oxidative stress.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".