Navigating Economic Development in Palestine: Analysis of Key Challenges
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the influence of various economic determinantsincluding economic policies, economic dependence, foreign aid, corruption, and unemploymenton the economic development of Palestinian society.This research utilizes the analytical descriptive methodology where qualitative insights are gathered from in-depth interviews with key specialized stakeholders from four Palestinian related institutions.Further, 252 questionnaires have been addressed to Palestinian citizen to assess their views about challenges facing the economic development in the country.The study finds that economic policies can bolster production levels to a certain extent.Economic dependence appears to challenge the production capacity of the Palestinian economy.Notably, foreign aid does not serve the purpose of financing the general budget deficit and hence the development goals.Furthermore, the presence of corruption seems to hinder the state's ability to effectively roll out economic development strategies.To foster economic growth, there's a crucial need to refine existing economic policies and augment production avenues.Mitigating the adverse effects of economic dependence can be achieved by fostering an equitable investment environment that promotes diverse project initiations.Moreover, the reliance on foreign aid to cover the public budget deficit necessitates an overhaul, underscoring the importance of advanced coordination and regulatory mechanisms between official and civil society institutions.The comprehensive approach used in this study aligns with Palestine's current development plans, making the findings particularly relevant for policymakers.Overall, this research serves as a pivotal resource for a range of national and international stakeholders aiming to understand and address Palestine's economic development challenges.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".