Chemotaxis Response of Phasmarhabditis californica (Family: Rhabditidae) and Pristionchus entomophagus (Family: Neodiplogasteridae) to the Mucus of Four Slug Species
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The chemotaxis responses of soil nematodes have been well studied in bacteriophagic nematodes, plant-parasitic nematodes, entomopathogenic nematodes, and to a lesser extent malacopathogenic nematodes. Free-living stages of parasitic nematodes often use chemotaxis to locate hosts. In this study, we compared the chemotaxis profile of 2 slug-associated nematodes with overlapping host ranges. Phasmarhabditis californica is a facultative parasite that has been shown to express strain-dependent variation in chemoattraction profile. We tested 4 slug species to determine the attraction index of a Canadian strain of Ph. californica and a sympatric necromenic nematode, Pristionchus entomophagus. When tested against a control (distilled water), Ph. californica showed a clear (positive) attraction towards the mucus of slugs Ambigolimax valentianus, Arion rufus, and Arion fasciatus, but not Deroceras reticulatum. However, when given a choice between the mucus of D. reticulatum and Ar. fasciatus in a pairwise test, Ph. californica was strongly attracted to the former. Other pairwise comparisons did not reveal a clear preference for either slug species in the following pairs: D. reticulatum-Ar. rufus, Am. valentianus-Ar. rufus, D. reticulatum-Am. valentianus. The chemotaxis assay for Pr. entomophagus showed an attraction toward D. reticulatum and Ar. fasciatus (tested against controls); the attraction index for Am. valentianus was positive, but this was not statistically significant. In contrast, the attraction index for Ar. rufus was negative, suggesting possible repulsion to the mucus of this slug species. Given that Pr. entomophagus and Ph. californica occupy overlapping habitats, utilize similar hosts, and exhibit similar chemotaxis profiles, there is a potential for direct interaction between these 2 nematodes. Like other members of the genus Pristionchus, Pr. entomophagus may be able to prey upon the co-occurring Ph. californica, such antagonistic interactions could have important implications for the coexistence of these 2 species and Ph. californica in particular as a biocontrol agent against pestiferous slugs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".