MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392236671 · doi:10.1645/23-61

Chemotaxis Response of Phasmarhabditis californica (Family: Rhabditidae) and Pristionchus entomophagus (Family: Neodiplogasteridae) to the Mucus of Four Slug Species

2024· article· en· W4392236671 on OpenAlexaffabout
D. B. M. Patuwatha Withanage, Lien T. Luong

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Parasitology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicEntomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSlugBiologyMucusMicrobiologyChemotaxisZoologyEcologyGeneticsReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The chemotaxis responses of soil nematodes have been well studied in bacteriophagic nematodes, plant-parasitic nematodes, entomopathogenic nematodes, and to a lesser extent malacopathogenic nematodes. Free-living stages of parasitic nematodes often use chemotaxis to locate hosts. In this study, we compared the chemotaxis profile of 2 slug-associated nematodes with overlapping host ranges. Phasmarhabditis californica is a facultative parasite that has been shown to express strain-dependent variation in chemoattraction profile. We tested 4 slug species to determine the attraction index of a Canadian strain of Ph. californica and a sympatric necromenic nematode, Pristionchus entomophagus. When tested against a control (distilled water), Ph. californica showed a clear (positive) attraction towards the mucus of slugs Ambigolimax valentianus, Arion rufus, and Arion fasciatus, but not Deroceras reticulatum. However, when given a choice between the mucus of D. reticulatum and Ar. fasciatus in a pairwise test, Ph. californica was strongly attracted to the former. Other pairwise comparisons did not reveal a clear preference for either slug species in the following pairs: D. reticulatum-Ar. rufus, Am. valentianus-Ar. rufus, D. reticulatum-Am. valentianus. The chemotaxis assay for Pr. entomophagus showed an attraction toward D. reticulatum and Ar. fasciatus (tested against controls); the attraction index for Am. valentianus was positive, but this was not statistically significant. In contrast, the attraction index for Ar. rufus was negative, suggesting possible repulsion to the mucus of this slug species. Given that Pr. entomophagus and Ph. californica occupy overlapping habitats, utilize similar hosts, and exhibit similar chemotaxis profiles, there is a potential for direct interaction between these 2 nematodes. Like other members of the genus Pristionchus, Pr. entomophagus may be able to prey upon the co-occurring Ph. californica, such antagonistic interactions could have important implications for the coexistence of these 2 species and Ph. californica in particular as a biocontrol agent against pestiferous slugs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of ParasitologySame topicEntomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest ControlFrench-language works237,207