Agrotourism Development Efforts in Bangelan Village Based on Assessment Community Readiness Level
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Assessment of community readiness is an important step in developing actions that can be taken in the future.This research aims to identify the readiness of the Bangelan Village community for the development of the Bangelan Agro Tourism Village.condition of community readiness was analyzed qualitatively, and the score assessment of the level of community readiness was analyzed using the 2014 Tri-Ethnic Center Community Readiness Model, which uses five variables, namely community knowledge, leadership, community conditions, community knowledge about problems, and problem-solving resources.The analysis results show that Bangelan Village is on the 6th ladder of "initiation", which means that community members know about local efforts; leadership plays a vital role in planning, developing, and/or implementing new efforts, modifications, or improvements, and attitudes in the community.Based on this readiness, efforts to develop it include carrying out socialization and training, improving facilities and infrastructure, clarifying the institutional framework, and increasing the creativity of leaders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it