MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392263466 · doi:10.1353/tt.2024.a920468

A Note from the Editor

2024· article· en· W4392263466 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Susanne Shawyer

Bibliographic record

VenueTheatre topics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheatre and Performance Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyMathematics education

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Note from the Editor Susanne Shawyer Why theatre? I ask all my students this question on the first day of class. Whether they are majors eager for a career in the arts or non-majors who have elected to spend a few months studying theatre, the answer is often the same. Why theatre? Because at some point in their lives, they found connection, community, or inspiration through a live performance experience. The artists and practitioners speak of the joy of ensemble and backstage camaraderie. Those who see themselves primarily as audience recount collective gasps, communal tears, and energy exchange with performers. Why theatre? Because theatre is an artform of collaborative storytelling. Theatre connects. This issue of Theatre Topics explores how we connect through theatre and examines how we could connect better. It takes its inspiration from the 2023 Association for Theatre in Higher Education conference theme "Building from the Rubble: Centering Care" and corresponding call to action that challenged the profession to "see what we might become and achieve collectively when the entire field centers equity, empathy, and historically marginalized voices" ("ATHE 2023"). The authors who contributed to this issue ask big questions about the state of the profession and how we can center care in our professional relationships. They call for us to examine how we connect to our students and wider communities through the everyday work that we do, from selecting a season to teaching script analysis. They examine systems that replicate bias and privilege. They offer alternate structures that support broad definitions of scholarly and artistic excellence and feature relationships of connection and care. In her article "Critical Conversations: Emerging BIPOC Critics Reimagine Theatre Criticism through the Digital," Michelle MacArthur explores how the field can resist the historical inequities of legacy media theatre criticism by centering connection, conversation, and collaboration. MacArthur's case study is Taking on the World, a mentorship program for emerging BIPOC critics created in collaboration with Toronto's Intermission magazine and Soulpepper Theatre's pandemic audio play series Around the World in 80 Plays. The project was built around conversation with artists, BIPOC mentors, and participants, resulting in dialogic critical responses that experimented with form and offered a plurality of voices. MacArthur argues that this model can not only "unsettle entrenched hierarchies between critic and artist, artist and audience, and critic and reader" but also produce "work that reflects the range of responses invited by any performance." I encourage readers further interested in ways that arts criticism can resist structures of privilege and inequity to engage this essay in conversation with Adam Versényi's "Arts Criticism Pedagogy for the Twenty-First Century," published online in our last issue, which takes up similar issues in the theatre classroom. In "Factors Affecting Theatre Faculty Job Satisfaction: A Thematic Analysis," Kevork Horissian, Biliana Stoytcheva, and Wei You discuss their findings from 2022's Theatre Faculty Job Satisfaction and Campus Climate Survey. Perhaps unsurprisingly, what theatre faculty enjoy most is what theatre does best: connection and collaboration. Relationships with students, creative collaborations, institutional cultures of shared goals and transparent communications, and a diversity of identities and perspectives all contribute to job satisfaction. Job dissatisfaction comes from heavy workloads, inadequate financial support, and murky promotion and tenure guidelines. As they dive deep into questions of institutional culture, faculty evaluation, and DEI initiatives, the authors provide a valuable snapshot of the state of the profession. By providing quantitative and qualitative analysis of job satisfaction, this article is essential reading for chairs, deans, program heads, and other administrators who advocate for the value of educational theatre programs. [End Page 1] The first of our Notes from the Field is Claire Syler's "Visit to a Familiar Planet: Some Questions to Ask Before Season Selection." Inspired by Elinor Fuchs's well-known script analysis model "EF's Visit to a Small Planet: Some Questions to Ask a Play," Syler challenges us to consider our "regional, institutional, and local world as a social text that is worth reading before (or alongside) selecting plays for a theatrical season." Her provocation asks us to examine intentionally and thoughtfully our spaces, communities, and local histories in order to produce theatre that truly connects...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.833
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTheatre topicsSame topicTheatre and Performance StudiesFrench-language works237,207