MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392288047 · doi:10.5530/pj.2024.16.8

Predictive Simulation and Functional Insights of Serotonin Transporter: Ligand Interactions Explored through Database Analysis

2024· article· en· W4392288047 on OpenAlexaff
Irzan Nurman, Ninik Mudjihartini, Nurhadi Ibrahim, Linda Erlina, Fadilah Fadilah, Muchtaruddin Mansyur

Bibliographic record

VenuePharmacognosy Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Canadian institutionsInnovation Cluster (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSerotonin transporterSerotonin Plasma Membrane Transport ProteinsTransporterParoxetineLigand (biochemistry)ChemistrySerotoninIn silicoHydrogen bondStereochemistryBiochemistryReceptorMolecule

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By regulating serotonin levels and exerting an influence on mood, cognition, and a variety of physiological processes, the serotonin reuptake transporter (SERT) plays a critical role. Palmitoylation is a post-translational modification that allows for the regulation of protein kinetics and trafficking. SERT is a target for palmitoylation. Reducing the expression of SERT through the use of small interference RNA (SERT-siRNA) has been demonstrated to have antidepressant properties and to modify important markers of antidepressant action. These markers include the expression and function of 5-HT1A-autoreceptors, the levels of extracellular serotonin, neurogenesis, and the expression of genes related to plasticity. SERT expression on platelet membranes is downregulated when plasma serotonin levels are elevated, which limits the amount of serotonin that platelets can take in.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePharmacognosy JournalSame topicReceptor Mechanisms and SignalingFrench-language works237,207