MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392292723 · doi:10.18280/ijdne.190131

Non-Destructive Prediction of Moisture and Fat Content in Cocoa Beans Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Multivariate Regression Models

2024· article· en· W4392292723 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rita Hayati, Firzha Ade Maulina, Agus Arip Munawar

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversitas Syiah Kuala
KeywordsPartial least squares regressionWater contentMoisturePrincipal component analysisLinear regressionMultivariate statisticsNear-infrared spectroscopyPrincipal component regressionRegression analysisMathematicsCoefficient of determinationAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Environmental scienceChemistryStatisticsChromatographyBiologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Presented paper aimed to apply the near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) for rapid, nondestructive and simultaneous prediction of moisture and fat content on intact cocoa beans.Near infrared spectral data were acquired using a portable NIRS instrument (PSD NIRS i16, Universitas Syiah Kuala) in the wavelength range of 1000-2500 nm.Actual moisture and fat contents were measured and determined by means of thermo-gravimetry and soxhlet methods respectively.Spectral data were enhanced and corrected using standard normal variate (SNV) and de-trending order 2 (Dt-2) methods.Prediction models, used to determine the moisture and fat contents were established using partial least square regression (PLSR) and principal component regression (PCR).The results showed that moisture content and fat content can be predicted non-destructively and simultaneously using NIRS with maximum prediction index (RPD) are 2.16 for moisture content and 2.39 for fat content respectively which can be categorized as good model performances.Moreover, SNV found to be the ebst spectra correction method in predicting both moisture and fat contents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.906
Threshold uncertainty score0.496

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and EcodynamicsSame topicSpectroscopy and Chemometric AnalysesFrench-language works237,207