MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392292788 · doi:10.1017/cls.2023.19

Dia Dabby. Religious Diversity in Canadian Public Schools: Rethinking the Role of Law. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2022, 291 pp.

2024· article· en· W4392292788 on OpenAlexaffabout
Blair Major

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligious Education and Schools
Canadian institutionsThompson Rivers University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiversity (politics)Religious diversityPolitical scienceLawSociologyAnthropology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To say that religious diversity in public schools is an important topic may sound trite, and to say that it is particularly important in Canada may sound odd.But both statements are true.It is this important topic that Dia Dabby addresses in her book Religious Diversity in Canadian Public Schools: Rethinking the Role of Law.Dabby deftly shows why the topic is important, and why it is particularly important in Canada.In political terms, the education of children is ground zero for developing and maintaining the citizenry.School is where children first encounter people who are different-including religious difference-and a crucial part of childhood education is to socialize people that are different, with the goal that they will become part of a common social/political body.This is particularly relevant in Canada because of the historical confrontations and negotiations between English, French, and Indigenous peoples.Religious difference is a central theme in the story of Canada, and public schools are a central place where the story is acted out.The Canadian Constitution-both its 1867 and 1982 iterations-includes special protection for religious minority schools.Dabby rightly notes that the management of religious diversity in public schools is something of a "constitutional weather vane," which charts the course of Canadian constitutionalism (p.196).The constitutional legal (and political) context of religious diversity in public schools is not the focus of Dabby's book, however.Her book assesses the way that matters of religious diversity in public schools are managed, and the structural role that law plays.Dabby's approach to this examines the experience-in her words the "voices"-of children involved in conflicts of religious diversity in school.Dabby's analysis focuses on the complexity that exists in these situations, which involve the intersection of the interests of children, of parents, of religious

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.959
Threshold uncertainty score0.300

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.008
Science and technology studies0.0100.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et SociétéSame topicReligious Education and SchoolsFrench-language works237,207