MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392295931 · doi:10.18280/ijdne.190130

Development and Validation of a RP-HPLC Method for Simultaneous Quantification of Paracetamol and Phenylephrine Hydrochloride

2024· article· en· W4392295931 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mumin Fareed Hamad Al-Samarrai, Mahmood Zaki Lafta, Muath Jabbar Tarfa Al-Abbasee, Ola J. Muhammad

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAnalytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChromatographyHigh-performance liquid chromatographyHydrochlorideChemistryBiomedical engineeringMedicineOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A rapid, accurate, and sensitive method for the simultaneous quantification of paracetamol and phenylephrine hydrochloride was developed using RP-HPLC. The procedure utilized a NUCLEODUR C18 separating column (250 4.6 mm id) with a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min and a column temperature of 25. The detector wavelength was set at 234 nm, and the injection volume was 20 L. The mobile phase consisted of a mixture of acetonitrile and buffer solution (45 mM orthophosphoric acid, and the pH was adjusted to 6 using a 10% (w/v) sodium hydroxide solution) in a 52:48 v/v ratio. The method was validated with recovery percentages ranging from 99.36 to 105% for paracetamol and 99.78 to 100.8% for phenylephrine. The correlation coefficients were 0.9999 for both compounds, with linearity ranges of 2-100 g/mL for paracetamol and 5-80 g/mL for phenylephrine. This method has been successfully applied to the simultaneous quantification of these drugs in pharmaceutical preparations available in the local market.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and EcodynamicsSame topicAnalytical Methods in PharmaceuticalsFrench-language works237,207