TNF Superfamily and ILC2 Activation in Asthma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Eosinophilic asthma is the most prevalent and well-defined phenotype of asthma. Despite a majority of patients responding to corticosteroid therapy and T2 biologics, there remains a subset that have recurrent asthma exacerbations, highlighting a need for additional therapies to fully ameliorate airway eosinophilia. Group 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2) are considered key players in the pathogenesis of eosinophilic asthma through the production of copious amounts of type 2 cytokines, namely IL-5 and IL-13. ILC2 numbers are increased in the airways of asthmatics and with the greatest numbers of activated ILC2 detected in sputa from severe prednisone-dependent asthma with uncontrolled eosinophilia. Although epithelial-derived cytokines are important mediators of ILC2 activation, emerging evidence suggests that additional pathways stimulate ILC2 function. The tumor necrosis factor super family (TNFSF) and its receptors (TNFRSF) promote ILC2 activity. In this review, we discuss evidence supporting a relationship between ILC2 and TNFSF/TNFRSF axis in eosinophilic asthma and the role of this relationship in severe asthma with airway autoimmune responses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".