Research on How to Construct a Dialogical Teaching Course under the Development of Online-Offline Integrated Teaching and Learning—The Intermediate Financial Accounting Course as an Example
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the rapid development of information technology in recent years, the online-offline integrated teaching mode has become a new normal of teaching. The dialog consciousness, dialog scenario, dialog carrier and dialog evaluation of teaching under the development of online-offline integrated teaching differ from traditional offline teaching to a certain extent, so how to improve the quality of teaching in the development of online-offline teaching through the design of dialogic course teaching is of great practical significance. Based on this, the article takes the Intermediate Financial Accounting course in colleges and universities as an example, and constructs a dialogic teaching course that integrates dialogic awareness, dialogic scenarios, dialogic support and dialogic evaluation based on the dialogic teaching theory and using the ADDIE model in the whole process of analyzing, designing, developing, implementing and evaluating in order to improve the quality of the course teaching, and to provide references to the informatization teaching change in the field of education.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it