Acceptability and feasibility of delivering family intervention for caregivers of patients with schizophrenia in Egypt
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background : In Egypt as elsewhere, patients with schizophrenia and their families confront unique obstacles. This study examined the views of important stakeholders’ on the feasibility, approval, and obstacles of family intervention programs for schizophrenia in Egypt to address these issues. Objective: The aim of the study was to investigate the perspectives of stakeholders regarding the feasibility, acceptability, and obstacles associated with providing family intervention for schizophrenia in Egypt. Methods: The research took place at El-Maamoura Hospital in Alexandria and included a total of 37 participants. These participants were divided into seven focus groups, with 25 individuals being health professionals and the remaining 12 individuals being caregivers. Concurrently, data collection and analysis were carried out using the qualitative research method, employing the framework analysis to process the transcripts. Results: The participants highlighted the importance of families feeling accepted and well-informed regarding the nature of the illness. In conclusion, the participants suggested making changes to the intervention’s content by incorporating details about the illness, providing emotional support, and including culturally appropriate coping mechanisms. Conclusion: In conclusion, it is determined by the study that before implementing family intervention for schizophrenia, it is crucial to make cultural adjustments to ensure its acceptability. The findings of the study offer valuable insights for the development and execution of family intervention programs for schizophrenia in Egypt. Implication for Clinical Practice: It is crucial to culturally adapt a modified family interventions to cater to the cultural requirements of families and healthcare professionals in Egypt, as this could potentially result in improved outcomes for patients diagnosed with schizophrenia and their families.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".