MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

CO2 capture using gas-lift pumps operating under two-phase flow conditions

2024· article· en· W4392337732 on OpenAlexafffund
Alexander Doucette, Shahriyar Ghazanfari Holagh, Wael H. Ahmed

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCarbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceVolumetric flow rateMechanicsIsothermal processPositive displacement meterSlug flowLift (data mining)Mass flow rateMass transferIsothermal flowTwo-phase flowFlow (mathematics)ThermodynamicsEnvironmental scienceOpen-channel flowPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Gas-lift pumps is evaluated for degasification (CO 2 stripping). • Simulated flue gas containing different volumetric CO2 concentrations is investigated. • Two-phase flow hydrodynamics is evaluated using high-speed imaging and capacitance sensor . • Churn flow is found to demonstrate superior mass transfer performance. • The CO 2 mass transfer performance exhibits a linear growth trajectory within the slug flow regime. CO 2 capture through dissolution in water offers environmental benefits and industry applications. However, current studies mostly focus on CO 2 extraction into solvents, overlooking its direct solubility in water. Alternatively, gas-lift pumps may hold significant potential for capturing and storing CO 2 in water; but this ability remains unexplored. Therefore, this study experimentally delves into the CO 2 capture capacity and hydraulic performance of a dual injection gas-lift pump with a 25.4 m m riser diameter. Operating at a constant submergence ratio of 70 %, the pump is fed with simulated flue gas with flow rates within 5–30 L P M at volumetric CO 2 concentrations of 10 %, 15 %, and 25 %, and temperatures of 22 °C (isothermal operation) and 110 °C (non-isothermal operation). Two-phase flow hydrodynamics is also evaluated using high-speed imaging in conjunction with time-series void fraction measurements. Within the riser pipe, three distinct two-phase flow patterns — slug, intermittent, and churn flows — are identified. The results reveal that under both isothermal and non-isothermal operations and across all volumetric CO 2 concentration levels, churn flow demonstrates superior mass transfer coefficient and lifted liquid flow rate, while slug flow achieves minimum energy consumption per ton of captured CO 2 , highest CO 2 capture degree, and maximum lifting efficiency. Also, the highest degrees of sensitivity to inlet gas flow rate for volumetric mass transfer coefficient, delivered liquid flow rate, and void fraction were observed in slug flow regime. Both gas temperature and volumetric CO 2 concentration positively impacted the mass transfer performance. However, the pump showed remarkably higher lifting efficiencies under isothermal operation conditions. Moreover, compared to four established CO 2 capture methods (absorption, adsorption, cryogenic distillation, and membrane diffusion), the gas-lift pump exhibits moderately lower energy consumption, at 38-266 k W h / t o n C O 2 , but with lower CO 2 capture degree of 2.3 % to 6.7 %.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.611
Threshold uncertainty score0.480

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Heat and Mass TransferSame topicCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207