Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) images of road vehicles dataset
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) seeks to improve traffic flow to guarantee transportation safety. One of the ITS's fundamental tenets is identifying and classifying vehicles into various classes. Although the issues related to small size, variety of forms, and similarity in visual appearance of the vehicles, as well as the influence of the weather on the video and image quality, make it challenging to categorize vehicles using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV); they are becoming more popular in computer vision-related applications. Traffic accidents are now a serious public health concern that must be addressed in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. An automatic vehicle detection and classification system can be considered one of the remedies to solve this issue. This paper presents a dataset of 2,160 images of vehicles on the roads in the Iraqi Kurdistan Region to address the issue of the absence of such a dataset. The images in the proposed collection were taken with a Mavic Air 2 drone in the Iraqi cities of Sulaymaniyah and Erbil. The images are categorized into five classes: bus, truck, taxi, personal car, and motorcycle. Data gathering considered diverse circumstances, multiple vehicle sizes, weather and lighting conditions, and massive camera movements. Pre-processing and data augmentation methods were applied to the images in our proposed dataset, including auto-orient, brightness, hue, and noise algorithm, which can be used to build an efficient deep learning (DL) model. After applying these augmentation techniques for the car, taxi, truck, motorcycle, and bus classes, the number of images was increased to 5,353, 1,500, 1,192, 282, and 176, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".