Adult patients treated for bladder exstrophy at a young age
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Bladder exstrophy-epispadias complex is a rare condition that necessitates numerous surgical procedures during a patient's youth to achieve adequate urine storage and continence. This study aimed to identify the specific needs and functional challenges faced by adults who underwent pediatric bladder exstrophy reconstructions and assess the management of these issues in an adult population. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted for all bladder exstrophy complex patients who underwent surgery at a young age and were subsequently referred to our center between 2005 and 2020. Inclusion criteria included patients with cloacal or classical bladder exstrophy older than 18 years. We recorded the reasons for referral, management of contemporary complaints, types of past and present urinary reconstructions, and their current functional status. RESULTS: The study included 38 patients. The primary reasons for referral were incontinence (39%) and catheterization difficulties (24%). Management typically involved partial or complete surgical revision of their urinary reservoir, occasionally combined with a bladder neck procedure. Ultimately, only three patients continued to experience incontinence, while none reported catheterization issues after undergoing treatment at our center. Long-term exstrophy-related reconstruction complications included urinary tract infections (39%), stones (29%), stenosis (24%), fistulas (13%), chronic renal disease (16%), metabolic abnormalities (3%), and cancer (3%). CONCLUSIONS: Adults who have previously undergone bladder exstrophy reconstruction exhibit a wide range of urologic reconstructions. Their needs often revolve around continence and catheterization concerns. Most patients with satisfactory functional outcomes perform self-catheterization through a continent cutaneous channel and have either a continent pouch or an augmented bladder.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".