MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392349036 · doi:10.18280/ts.410119

Dual Deep Learning and Feature-Based Models for Classification of Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Using Narrow Band Imaging

2024· article· en· W4392349036 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
J. Sharmila Joseph, Abhay Vidyarthi

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHead and Neck Cancer Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeature (linguistics)Basal cellDual (grammatical number)Artificial intelligenceNarrow-band imagingComputer scienceDeep learningPattern recognition (psychology)MedicineRadiologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (LSCC) is a prevalent form of laryngeal cancer that originates from the mucosal surface of the larynx.The visual analysis of laryngeal tissue vascular patterns poses a significant challenge, as it heavily relies on the expertise and experience of medical practitioners.This paper proposes a dual approach for the early diagnosis of LSCC by employing a lightweight Deep Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and statistical features.It further delves into feature visualization and interpretation of the proposed classification models.Methods: The initial step involves enhancing image quality through Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE).In the first approach, we employ a modified SqueezeNet for classifying laryngeal tissues.In the second approach, we extract a combination of first-order statistical features -Percentile-25, Percentile-50, Percentile-75, Mean, and Standard Deviation of each RGB channeland second-order statistical features such as Contrast, Energy, Homogeneity, and Correlation from the Gray-Level Co-Occurrence Matrix (GLCM).These features are then classified using the Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) classification model.Results: The proposed models are trained and validated using an augmented publicly available dataset, prepared for both binary and multiclass classifications.The results indicate that the proposed models demonstrate exceptional accuracy and efficiency in classifying types of laryngeal cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.955
Threshold uncertainty score0.480

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicHead and Neck Cancer StudiesFrench-language works237,207