MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392349425 · doi:10.18280/ts.410145

Enhanced Solar Power Forecasting Using XG Boost and PCA-Based Sky Image Analysis

2024· article· en· W4392349425 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rahul Saraswat, Deepak Jhanwar, Manish Gupta

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSolar Radiation and Photovoltaics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolar powerSkyImage (mathematics)Computer scienceEnvironmental sciencePower (physics)Artificial intelligenceMeteorologyGeographyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the field of solar energy forecasting, the accurate prediction of photovoltaic (PV) system output remains a pivotal challenge.This study addresses this challenge through an innovative approach, employing sky image processing for the prediction of solar power energy production.Central to this approach is the utilization of the XG Boost Regressor, a machine learning algorithm renowned for its efficiency and accuracy.Unlike traditional methods such as Random Forest Regression, Gradient Boosting, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Support Vector Regression (SVR), the XG Boost Regressor demonstrated superior performance, evidenced by its lower Mean Squared Error (MSE).A key aspect of this study was the application of Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for dimensionality reduction within the sky image dataset.This technique effectively distilled the dataset to its most essential features, thereby enhancing the modeling process.The predictive model, based on images captured at regular intervals, was rigorously evaluated using several metrics, including Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), relative absolute error (RAE), and relative squared error (RSE).The results were compelling, with the XG Boost Regressor achieving a RAE rate of 0.100121089, a MSE of 0.001425576, a MAE of 0.0019102173, and a root relative squared error (RRSE) of 0.146707803.These metrics underscore the model's high accuracy in forecasting solar power energy.Additionally, the study incorporated RGB histograms for the extraction of dimensional features from the image data.This, coupled with the PCA for dimensionality reduction, formed a robust methodology for estimating solar energy output.The integration of the XG Boost Regressor and PCA not only facilitated accurate solar power energy predictions but also marked a significant advancement in the field of renewable energy forecasting.The findings from this research underscore the efficacy of the XG Boost Regressor and PCA in solar power prediction, offering a promising avenue for future developments in the renewable energy sector.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.934
Threshold uncertainty score0.611

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicSolar Radiation and PhotovoltaicsFrench-language works237,207