MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392350671 · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2024-ioc.76

756 FO74 – Dietary habits and incident knee- and shoulder injuries in adolescent handball: a cohort study with 1149 male and female players

2024· article· en· W4392350671 on OpenAlexaff
Clara Onell, Eva Skillgate, Pierre Côté, Markus Waldén, Henrik Källberg, Martin Hägglund, Birgitta Edlund, Anna Melin, Martin Asker

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMealHazard ratioPhysical therapyAthletesCohort studyCohortProportional hazards modelConfidence intervalInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Studies indicate that inadequate dietary habits such as low meal frequency and intake of low-energy-dense foods are associated with injuries in adolescent athletes from weight-sensitive sports. This association has been less studied in team sports. Objective To investigate the association between meal frequency, meal timing and nutritional quality, respectively, and incident knee- and shoulder injuries in adolescent handball players. Design Prospective study based on the Swedish Handball Cohort. Setting Swedish handball-profiled secondary schools. Participants Players free from knee and shoulder injuries at baseline, followed 1–3 seasons 2020–2023, including 1149 participants (53% male, mean age 16.7 ± 0.9 years) and 1717 player seasons. Assessment of Risk Factors Meal frequency, meal timing in relation to training/games and intake frequency of foods (i.e., fruits/vegetables, wholegrain etc.), generating a nutritional quality score of 0–12 according to national dietary guidelines, were assessed in a baseline web-survey. Main Outcome Measurements The Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center Overuse Injury Questionnaire was used to assess a substantial injury through weekly follow-ups. An event was registered when the first substantial knee and/or shoulder injury occurred. Cox proportional hazard regression analyses (adjusted for previous injury, dietary supplements, playing position, sleep, sex, and school) including cumulative exposure time-to-event of minutes of playing handball were performed, generating adjusted hazard rate ratios (HRR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results Each increase in nutritional score was associated with a HRR of 1.07 (95% CI 1.01–1.14). Each increase in daily meals generated a HRR of 1.01 (95% CI 0.91–1.11) and each additional meal timed with training/games generated a HRR of 1.00 (95% CI 0.92–1.08). Conclusions Higher nutritional score was associated with incident injuries in adolescent handball players, but not meal frequency or meal timing. These results suggest that sports nutrition recommendations rather than national dietary guidelines may be of clinical importance in adolescent handball.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Observationallow
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Observationallow
models agreeAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Labeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDiverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education StudiesFrench-language works237,207