MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392353846 · doi:10.18280/rcma.340111

Enhancing Mechanical and Physical Properties of Epoxy Composites with Eco-Friendly Metakaolin Filler: An Experimental Study

2024· article· fr· W4392353846 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Janan H. Saadie, Sumeia A. Mechi, A. R. Hassan

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue des composites et des matériaux avancés · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer Nanocomposites and Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpoxyComposite materialFiller (materials)MetakaolinMaterials scienceEnvironmentally friendlyCompressive strength

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper focuses on the preparation and characterization of the reinforcement of an epoxy with metakaolin clay of grain size (45 ≤ d ≤60) μm as an eco-friendly inorganic material to improve its mechanical and physical properties with low-cost filler.Various proportions of (0, 15, 30, 45, and 60) wt.% of metakaolin were intrinsically mixed with epoxy to invistigate their physical properties represented by moisture absorption.Tensile test was employed to determine their mechanical properties such as ultimate tensile strength, yield strength, modulus of elasticity, as well as compressive strength, flexural strength and Vickers hardness test which was used to specify hardness number.The obtained experimental results showed improvement in the modulus of elasticity, compressive strength, and hardness with the addition of metakaolin.In contrast, the yield and tensile strength of the composite specimens which decrease with the increase in metakaolin content.Also, absorption of moisture test at different immersion times was carried out with different filler loadings of the prepared composite.The results of the test showed that a decreasing in water uptake for specimens with higher metakaolin content.From optical surface investigation using an optical microscope, it was found a reduction in porosity with an increase in the concentration of metakaolin and the specimen with weight percent of 60% is the highest homogeneity and less porosity and voids as compared to the other specimens.The prepared composite may find potential practical applications such as anti-corrosion coating, automotive components and medical devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue des composites et des matériaux avancésSame topicPolymer Nanocomposites and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207