MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392354176 · doi:10.18280/rcma.340108

Study Mechanical Properties for Polymer Composite Reinforced by Carbon Fibers and Copper Oxide Particles (CuO) Used in Make Prosthetic Limb

2024· article· en· W4392354176 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Estabraq Q. Merie, Waleed Bdaiwi Salih

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue des composites et des matériaux avancés · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComposite materialComposite numberMaterials scienceCopperCopper oxideOxideCarbon fibersPolymerMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the quest to advance the material science underpinning prosthetic limb technology, this study explores the mechanical fortification of unsaturated polyester-based composites via the incorporation of unidirectional carbon fibers and micro-scale copper oxide (CuO) particulates.The mechanical attributes scrutinized include hardness, impact resistance, compressive and tensile strengths, and flexural robustness.The fabrication process entailed manual molding techniques to yield homogenized composite samples.It was observed that the integration of carbon fibers markedly augmented the composite's mechanical performance.Specifically, the carbon fiber-reinforced specimens demonstrated a maximum hardness of 85.4 N/mm 2 , an impact strength cresting at 6.27 KJ/m 2 , a compressive strength peaking at 24.5 MPa, a tensile strength apex of 20 MPa, and a superior bending strength of 39.09 MPa.Conversely, the incorporation of CuO particles yielded mixed outcomes.While there was a notable increment in hardness strength to 83.5 N/mm 2 and a modest rise in impact strength to 0.70 KJ/m 2 , a diminution was witnessed in compressive, tensile, and bending strengths, which dwindled to 8.33 MPa, 5.07 MPa, and 9.54 MPa, respectively.The findings underscore the efficacy of carbon fiber reinforcements in significantly bolstering the structural integrity of composite materials destined for prosthetic applications, outperforming the enhancements provided by CuO particles.This research underscores the potential for carbon fiber to act as a pivotal reinforcement agent in the development of highperformance prosthetic limbs, providing a robust framework for future material innovation.The study's implications extend to the design of lightweight, durable prosthetic components that can endure the multifaceted demands placed on them during use.Future investigations could pivot towards optimizing fiber-matrix interfaces and exploring hybrid reinforcement strategies to further push the boundaries of prosthetic material capabilities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.173
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue des composites et des matériaux avancésSame topicAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207