MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract IA021: Novel genomic features of POLE-mutant tumors: the utility for tumor classification and identification of new driver alleles

2024· article· en· W4392354575 on OpenAlexaff
Daria Ostroverkhova, Kathryn Tyryshkin, Annette K. Beach, Elizabeth A. Moore, Yosef Masoudi‐Sobhanzadeh, Stephanie R. Barbari, Igor B. Rogozin, К. В. Шайтан, Anna R. Panchenko, Polina V. Shcherbakova

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentification (biology)AlleleMutantGeneticsComputational biologyBiologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Alterations in the exonuclease domain of POLE drive the development of ultramutated endometrial tumors with better prognosis. A hallmark of these tumors is the accumulation of G>T mutations in AGA sequences; however, understanding of their genomic features beyond the trinucleotide motifs is limited. We applied a novel computational framework to the whole-exome sequencing data of 524 endometrial tumors reported by The Cancer Genome Atlas network to analyze the extended DNA sequence context of ultramutation. We found that the presence of POLE driver alleles is associated with an increased frequency of G>T mutations in polypurine tracts. Sequences containing three consecutive purines, including the classic AGA context, are only moderately mutable, but the mutability increased abruptly as the tract length reached six or more purines. Moreover, mutations showed a strong preference for certain positions within the tracts, creating a characteristic quantifiable pattern. Using this signature, we developed a machine learning classifier to identify tumors with hitherto unknown POLE drivers and validated two new drivers, POLE-E978G and POLE-S461L, by functional assays in yeast. Unlike previously known pathogenic variants, the E978G substitution affects the DNA polymerase rather than exonuclease domain of POLE. We further show that the extended genomic signature of POLE ultramutation is shared by tumors with POLD1 drivers. These findings uncover new mechanisms of ultramutation and highlight the limitations of the current focus on POLE exonuclease domain variants when stratifying patients. Citation Format: Daria Ostroverkhova, Kathryn Tyryshkin, Annette K. Beach, Elizabeth A. Moore, Yosef Masoudi-Sobhanzadeh, Stephanie R. Barbari, Igor B Rogozin, Konstantin V Shaitan, Anna R Panchenko, Polina V. Shcherbakova. Novel genomic features of POLE-mutant tumors: the utility for tumor classification and identification of new driver alleles [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Endometrial Cancer: Transforming Care through Science; 2023 Nov 16-18; Boston, Massachusetts. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2024;30(5_Suppl):Abstract nr IA021.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.357
GPT teacher head0.559
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer ResearchSame topicRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207