Warming Mitigates the Impacts of Degradation on Nitrogen Allocation between Soil Microbes and Plants in Alpine Meadow
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In alpine meadows, plants and soil microbes typically engage in competition for nitrogen (N) under N-deficient conditions. However, the acquisition and distribution of N among soil microbes and plants under alpine meadow degradation and climate warming induced by global climate change are still uncharacterized. In this study, we isotope labeled inorganic (NH4+-15N, NO3−-15N) and organic (glycine-15N) N in both degraded and non-degraded plots by using open-top chambers (OTC) to mimic increasing air temperatures. After 6 h, the 15N contents in soil microbes and plants were measured to investigate the effects of degradation and rising air temperature on N allocations in the ecosystems studied. Results showed that alpine meadow degradation significantly reduced soil microbial N accumulation by 52% compared to those in non-degraded plots. In non-degraded plots, warming significantly lowered the organic N levels of soil microbes by 49%, whereas in degraded ones, it reduced both NH4+-15N and NO3−-15N recovery by 80% and 45% on average but increased glycine-15N recovery by 653%. Meanwhile, warming decreased the plant recovery of NH4+-15N and NO3−-15N by 75% and 45% but increased the recovery of glycine-15N by 45% in non-degraded plots. Conversely, in degraded plots, warming markedly lowered NH4+-15N recovery by 40% but increased glycine-15N recovery by 114%. Warming mitigates the effects of alpine meadow degradation on nitrogen allocation among soil microbes and plants. In unwarmed plots, degradation significantly elevated the total 15N recovery ratio of soil microbes to plants by 60%. However, in warmed plots, the impact of degradation on this ratio was reduced. The responses of the 15N recovery ratio of soil microbes and plants to rising temperatures were closely related to alpine meadow quality. In non-degraded areas, warming enhanced the recovery ratio for NH4+-15N by 165% but reduced it for glycine-15N by 66%. Conversely, in degraded plots, warming decreased the recovery ratio for NH4+-15N by 66% but increased it for glycine-15N by 232%. This indicates that warming can increase carbon limitation for soil microbes in degraded alpine meadows, and the restoration of degraded alpine meadows should prioritize restoring carbon accumulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".