One-third of global population at cancer risk due to elevated volatile organic compounds levels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Outdoor air pollution, particularly volatile organic compounds (VOCs), significantly contributes to the global health burden. Previous analyses of VOC exposure have typically focused on regional and national scales, thereby limiting global health burden assessments. In this study, we utilized a global chemistry-climate model to simulate VOC distributions and estimate related cancer risks from 2000 to 2019. Our findings indicated a 10.2% rise in global VOC emissions during this period, with substantial increases in Sub-Saharan Africa, the Rest of Asia, and China, but decreases in the U.S. and Europe due to reductions in the transportation and residential sectors. Carcinogenic VOCs such as benzene, formaldehyde, and acetaldehyde contributed to a lifetime cancer burden affecting 0.60 [95% confidence interval (95CI): 0.40–0.81] to 0.85 [95CI: 0.56–1.14] million individuals globally. We projected that between 36.4% and 39.7% of the global population was exposed to harmful VOC levels, with the highest exposure rates found in China (82.8–84.3%) and considerably lower exposure in Europe (1.7–5.8%). Open agricultural burning in less-developed regions amplified VOC-induced cancer burdens. Significant disparities in cancer burdens between high-income and low-to-middle-income countries were identified throughout the study period, primarily due to unequal population growth and VOC emissions. These findings underscore health disparities among different income nations and emphasize the persistent need to address the environmental injustice related to air pollution exposure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".