MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract A037: Exploring the therapeutic effectiveness of EO3001 in the treatment of clear cell ovarian cancers with ARID1A mutations

2024· article· en· W4392376240 on OpenAlexaff
Yuchen Ding, Lucy Yuqin Li, J Zhang, Farhia Kabeer, TszYin Lam, Forouh Kalantari, Jeffrey Bacha, Dennis Brown, Sarath Kanekal, Neil Sankar, Michael M. Lizardo, Amal M. El-Naggar, David G. Huntsman

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicChromatin Remodeling and Cancer
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsARID1AOvarian cancerMedicineOncologyCancer researchInternal medicineCancerBiologyMutationGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Clear Cell Ovarian Cancer (CCOC) is an inherently chemoresistant subtype of ovarian cancer, accounting for approximately 10% of all epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) in north America and up to 30% EOC in patients in Japan. Recent evidence suggests that hematogenous spread plays a crucial role in CCOC metastasis. However, this aspect has been largely overlooked due to the absence of an appropriate model. ARID1A, a subunit of the SWI/SNF complex, is mutated in around 65% of CCOC cases and has been identified as a key oncogenic factor in CCOC transformation. Mutations in the ARID1A gene result in an accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and a decrease in the antioxidant glutathione (GSH) due to the downregulation of SLC7A11, a transporter responsible for importing the GSH precursor cystine. Consequently, cancer cells with ARID1A mutations become highly reliant on oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) as an energy source. EO3001, a synthetic small molecule drug that has been studied in various cancers, can selectively transport extracellular Cu(II) to mitochondria. In mitochondria, Cu(II) can accumulate and induce mitochondrial ROS, thereby triggering cuproptosis. Recent studies have shown that ARID1A-deficient cells are more sensitive to EO3001. The Pulmonary Metastasis Assay (PuMA), an ex vivo model initially established for sarcomas, has been proven to provide a richer microenvironment compared to traditional 2D and 3D culture models. In PuMA, cancer cells labeled with fluorescent tags are inoculated into lung sections of mice inflated with agarose gel. The cells are then treated with drugs and/or different conditions, and the growth of cancer cells is measured and quantified by the fluorescence intensity of the lung sections. Methods: In this study, we generated isogenic CCOC cell lines (RMG-1, OVCA429, and JHOC-5 -/+ ARID1A loss) using CRISPR-Cas9. We then evaluated the therapeutic effects of EO3001 on the tumorigenic potential and cell growth of these cells in vitro and ex vivo: To assess the effects of EO3001, we performed multiple in vitro assays, including cell viability, cell proliferation, total and mitochondrial ROS levels, OXPHOS activities, migration, and invasion assays on CCOC cells with and without ARID1A loss, treated with or without EO3001 under various stress conditions. Additionally, we established and optimized the PuMA assay on CCOC cell lines to study the effects of EO3001 on the interactions between cancer cells and surrounding normal tissues. Conclusions: While there is a notable distinction in the response to EO3001 between CCOC -/+ ARID1A loss cell lines in both in vitro and ex vivo models, it is noteworthy that hypoxia significantly diminishes the effects of EO3001, potentially attributed to alterations in glycolysis and OXPHOS. Therefore, taking advantage of the susceptibility arising from the dependence on OXPHOS in ARID1A-deficient CCOC, the utilization of EO3001 could potentially present a highly encouraging and viable approach for the therapeutic management of these patients. Citation Format: Yuchen Ding, Lucy Yuqin Li, Joyce Yuhan Zhang, Farhia Kabeer, TszYin Lam, Forouh Kalantari, Jeffrey Bacha, Dennis Brown, Sarath Kanekal, Neil Sankar, Michael Lizardo, Amal EL-Naggar, David Huntsman. Exploring the therapeutic effectiveness of EO3001 in the treatment of clear cell ovarian cancers with ARID1A mutations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Ovarian Cancer; 2023 Oct 5-7; Boston, Massachusetts. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(5 Suppl_2):Abstract nr A037.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.426

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicChromatin Remodeling and CancerFrench-language works237,207