Effect of light curing units on color stability and mechanical properties of resin cements after aging
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the color stability, Martens hardness (HMV), and modulus of elasticity (Eit*) of resin cements light-cured using two types of light-emitting diodes (LED) subjected to ultraviolet (UV) aging. Two resin cements were used: light-cured (RelyX Veener) and dual-cured (Variolink II). Forty discs were confectioned for each resin cement (with a diameter of 5 mm and thickness of 1.5 mm). Half of the samples were light-cured by a Radii-cal singlewave and the other half by a Valo® polywave. The specimens were then stored at 37 °C and 100% relative humidity for 24 h to ensure complete polymerization. Baseline evaluations of the color alteration, HMV, and Eit* were performed. The specimens were aged for 252 h in an UV-accelerated aging chamber. Then, a final analysis was performed. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA was performed on the color changes. Meanwhile, three-way repeated-measures ANOVA followed by Tukey´s test was performed on HMV and Eit* to compare the means (α = 0.05). With regard to the color alteration (ΔE), there was no statistically significant difference between the materials or between the light curing units (p > 0.05). With regard to the mechanical properties, Valo® promoted high values of HMV and Eit* compared with Radii-cal (p < 0.05). With regard to the resin cements, Variolink II showed higher HMV and Eit* values than RelyX Veneer (p < 0.05), except for Eit* after UV aging. The light-curing unit influenced the mechanical properties but not the color stability of the resin cements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".