MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392393499 · doi:10.23880/jonam-16000442

Effectiveness of Siddha Varmam Therapy in Improving Pain, Flexibility and Quality of Life in Osteoarthritis Adults: A Randomized Controlled Study

2024· article· en· W4392393499 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Soumya Tiwari

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Natural & Ayurvedic Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicComplementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOsteoarthritisSiddhaFlexibility (engineering)Physical therapyRandomized controlled trialQuality of life (healthcare)MedicinePhysical medicine and rehabilitationAlternative medicineSurgeryTraditional medicineNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent degenerative joint disease-causing significant pain, stiffness, and functional disability. Current treatments, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), offer symptomatic relief but pose risks of adverse effects. Siddha Varmam therapy, a traditional Indian medical system, offers a non-invasive alternative focusing on pain management, flexibility enhancement, and quality of life improvement for the patients. Methods: This randomized control study involved 60 adults with OA, categorized 30 each into a control group receiving standard care and an intervention group undergoing Siddha Varmam therapy. The treatment group received the Siddha Varmam therapy at Chakrasiddh, which is a Siddha centre. The intervention outcomes measured pain, stiffness, and functionality, assessed at baseline and after the intervention period. Data was collected using WOMAC and VAS scores before and after assigning them to either Siddha Varmam therapy or NSAID treatment, ensuring 81% power to detect significant changes. Data analysis involved comparing mean changes in these variables, with the significance set at P<0.05. Also, Reliability of the assessments was determined using Cronbach's Alpha. Results: The intervention group showed significant improvements in pain (-23.19 mm reduction, P<.001), stiffness (-21.60 mm reduction, P=.007), and functionality (-20.50 mm improvement, P=.002) compared to the control group. These findings were supported by strong correlations between changes in the “Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores (r = 0.84, P<.001). The study also demonstrated high internal consistency for both control (Cronbach's Alpha = .902) and experimental (Cronbach's Alpha = .904) groups. Conclusion: Siddha Varmam therapy significantly reduces pain, stiffness, and improves functionality in OA patients, offering a viable and effective alternative to conventional treatments. The high reliability of the outcome measures supports the therapy's potential as a holistic approach to OA management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.032
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.106
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0320.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Natural & Ayurvedic MedicineSame topicComplementary and Alternative Medicine StudiesFrench-language works237,207