MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392421071 · doi:10.22202/jp.2022.v13i2.5814

DAMPAK LAYANAN INTERNET GRATIS UNTUK PELAJAR KELAS VIII SMPN 3 MAPAT TUNGGUL SELATAN PANGIAN KABUPATEN PASAMAN

2022· article· id· W4392421071 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Tuti Lestari, Harisnawati Harisnawati, Waza Karya Akbar

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Pelangi · 2022
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Methods and Media Use
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversitas AirlanggaUniversitas Negeri SemarangAthabasca University
KeywordsComputer scienceAdvertisingBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Layanan internet gratis ini diberikan kepada masyarakat Pangian khususnya untuk pelajar di SMP Negeri 3 Mapat Tunggul Selatan untuk mempermudahkan peserta didik dalam mengerjakan tugas sekolah. Tetapi kenyataannya pelajar kelas VIII di SMP Negeri 3 Mapat Tunggul Selatan tidak menggunakan layanan inernet gratis untuk kebutuhan Sekolah. Adapun tujuan penelitian ini adalah mendeskripsikan dampak layanan interenet gratis untuk kelas VIII Di SMP Negeri 3 Mapat Tunggul Selatan Jorong 3 Pangian Kabupaten Pasaman. Teori dalam penelitian ini yaitu teori belajar behavioristik. Pendekatan penelitian yang digunakan adalah kualitatif dengan tipe deskriptif. Informan penelitian purposive sampling. Teknik pengumpulan data berupa observasi, wawancara, dan studi dokumen. Unit analisis dalam penelitian ini yaitu kelompok. Analisis data menggunakan model Miles dan Huberman. Adapun dampak positif layanan internet gratis untuk pelajar Jorong 3 Pangian Mapat Tunggul Selatan Kabupaten Pasaman terdiri dari: (1) Memudahkan Dalam Proses Pembelajaran, (2) Sebagai sumber belajar, dan (3) Tidak mengeluarkan biaya. Sedangkan dampak negatif layanan internet gratis untuk kelas VIII di SMP Negeru 3 Mapat Tunggul Selatan Jorong 3 Pangian Kabupaten Pasaman terdiri dari: (1) Kecanduan game online, (2) Timbulnya sikap kurang menghargai, (3) Tidak disiplin mengantarkan tugas sekolah, (4) Tidak ada kontrol dari orang tua.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.231

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0690.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal PelangiSame topicEducational Methods and Media UseFrench-language works237,207