Saint François et le franciscanisme dans l’oeuvre de Pier PaoloPasolini
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The topics related to the sacred cross the whole Pasolinian work. Although the christic declension isundeniably predominant, the subject of holiness also occupies a prominent place, both in terms of thetransversality of genres and of the variety of accents : of a holiness incessantly, as much as in vain, researched,to the holiness of an ascetic power, passing through the oscillation between voluntary and involuntary holiness.To this polyhedral nature we can add the multitude of matrices from which the theme draws its source. In thissense, if the model of St Paul occupies a prominent position, other figures are to be counted. Among these, StFrancis of Assisi has features which, in the Pasolinian elaboration, can be summed up in a disseminated andsemantically versatile nature. In fact, if the direct apparitions of the Little Poor Man are essentially confined tothe furtive epiphany of the franciscan meta-fable of Uccellacci e uccellini - we will make reference to anemerged Franciscanism -, infinitely more are the franciscan stylistic modules declined as a symbolic repertoireof gestures. Thus the Pasolinian elaboration proceeds most often by extrapolation of the poetic word of thesaint and contamination of the sources, giving rise to a Franciscanism alternately allegorical-ideological,metalinguistic or figurative. The culminating and most secret point of this appropriation coincides with theunfulfilled writing of Bestemmia’s verse script, in which an anti-François with blasphemous featuresdismembers one of the major texts of the origins of Italian poetry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".