Accurate Determination of the Average Rate Constant of Pyrene Excimer Formation for Pyrene-Labeled Macromolecules from the Analysis of Individual Fluorescence Decays with Sums of Exponentials
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The average rate constant (⟨ k ⟩) for pyrene excimer formation (PEF) between an excited and a ground-state pyrenyl label covalently attached to a pyrene-labeled macromolecule (PyLM) has been found to be an ideal parameter to probe macromolecular conformations due to its proportionality to the local concentration ([ Py ] loc ) of pyrenyl labels in PyLM. To date, ⟨ k ⟩ has only been determined with the model-free analysis (MFA) involving the global analysis of the pyrene monomer and excimer fluorescence decays of PyLM. Unfortunately, the MFA is computationally demanding which prevents its widespread use. To circumvent this complication, a methodology is introduced that involves the analysis of individual fluorescence decays with sums of exponentials (SoE), which are commonly used in the analysis packages of commercial time-resolved fluorometers. The individual fluorescence decays of the pyrene monomer acquired with 286 PyLM were analyzed with a SoE to yield ⟨ k SoE-M ⟩. The strong correlation between ⟨ k SoE-M ⟩ and ⟨ k MF ⟩ obtained from the global MFA indicated that ⟨ k SoE-M ⟩ was a good representation of ⟨ k ⟩. Furthermore, the A E– / A E+ ratio, equal to the ratio of the sum of the negative pre-exponential factors over the sum of the positive pre-exponential factors, was determined by fitting the individual pyrene excimer fluorescence decays of the 286 PyLM with a SoE. A E– / A E+ was found to take a value between −1.0 and −0.8, indicating that the pyrenyl labels were not aggregated. This result indicated that [ Py ] loc was well described by ⟨ k SoE-M ⟩, so that ⟨ k SoE-M ⟩ could be used to describe the conformation of macromolecules in the same manner as ⟨ k MF ⟩. Consequently, the methodology based on the analysis of individual fluorescence decays with sums of exponentials to determine ⟨ k SoE-M ⟩ and A E– / A E+ provides a robust alternative to the use of the MFA for the study of PyLM to many scientists interested in the characterization of macromolecular conformations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".