MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392449955 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3373225

Mobile-Aware Service Offloading for UAV-Assisted IoV: A Multiagent Tiny Distributed Learning Approach

2024· article· en· W4392449955 on OpenAlexaff
Yan Liu, Peng Lin, Mengya Zhang, Zhizhong Zhang, F. Richard Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUAV Applications and Optimization
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationNatural Science Foundation of Jiangsu ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceMobile edge computingLyapunov optimizationFlexibility (engineering)Software deploymentDistributed computingOptimization problemComputer networkServerArtificial intelligenceAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs)-assisted multi-access edge computing (MEC) platforms are becoming an increasingly popular solution for infrastructure-less Internet of Vehicles (IoVs) due to their mobility and flexibility. To address the challenges of uneven task offloading and vehicle mobility, in this paper, we propose a mobility-aware service offloading and migration scheme for UAV-assisted IoVs. We formulate the service placement, service migration, and UAV deployment as an optimization problem to minimize the serving delay of task addressing for IoVs, under a predefined long-term migration cost budget. To solve the problem, we use the Lyapunov optimization method to transform the long-term optimization into a real-time optimization problem. Additionally, we design a multi-agent deep deterministic policy gradient (MADDPG) algorithm to solve the problem. Compared with traditional central optimization methods, the proposed algorithm can achieve a near-global optimal policy by leveraging only local observation information. Simulation results show that the proposed MADDPG algorithm can achieve good convergence performance, and the proposed scheme can achieve quasi-optimal performance in terms of serving delay, service offloading rate, and service migration cost.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicUAV Applications and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207