MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392451277 · doi:10.4269/ajtmh.23-0506

Postsurgical Outcomes of Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy due to Hippocampal Sclerosis Associated with Calcified Neurocysticercosis

2024· article· en· W4392451277 on OpenAlexaff
Walter De la Cruz, Sofía S. Sánchez, Denisse E. Chacón, Manuel Herrera, Liza Núñez del Prado, Carlos M. Vásquez, José C. Delgado

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParasitic infections in humans and animals
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHippocampal sclerosisInterquartile rangeMedicineTemporal lobeNeurocysticercosisEpilepsyMesial temporal lobe epilepsySurgeryPediatrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this study was to analyze postsurgical outcomes for individuals with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis (MTLE-HS) who underwent anterior temporal lobectomy, based on the presence of calcified neurocysticercosis (cNCC). A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on 89 patients with MTLE-HS who underwent anterior temporal lobectomy between January 2012 and December 2020 at a basic epilepsy surgery center located in Lima, Peru. We collected sociodemographic, clinical, and diagnostic information. The postsurgical results were analyzed using bivariate analysis according to the Engel classification. We included 89 individuals with a median age of 28 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 24-37), and more than half (55.1%) were male. Seventeen (19.1%) were diagnosed with cNCC. A greater number of patients with cNCC had lived in rural areas of Peru during their early life compared with those without cNCC (12 [70.6%] versus 26 [36.1%]; P = 0.010). Patients with cNCC exhibited a greater median frequency of focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures per month (1 [IQR: 0-2] versus 0 [0-0.5]; P = 0.009). Conversely, a lower proportion of patients with cNCC reported a history of an initial precipitating injury in comparison to the group without cNCC (4 [23.5%] versus 42 [58.3%]; P = 0.014). At the 1-year follow-up, most patients (82.4%) with cNCC were categorized as Engel IA. Similarly, at the 2-year follow-up, nine (75.0%) were classified as Engel IA. Our findings suggest that most patients diagnosed with cNCC exhibit favorable postsurgical outcomes, comparable to those without cNCC. Additionally, it can be postulated that cNCC may play a role as an initial precipitating injury.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Tropical Medicine and HygieneSame topicParasitic infections in humans and animalsFrench-language works237,207