A sul da quarentena e mulher privada de liberdade: reflexão teórica na pandemia da COVID-19
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O aprisionamento feminino tem apresentado substancial crescimento nas últimas décadas. Neste cenário, emergiu a pandemia do novo coronavírus, COVID-19, diante de um sistema fragilizado e condições mínimas de higiene, além da superlotação, a qual potencializa o agravamento da transmissibilidade. O artigo objetiva refletir sobre a invisibilidade das mulheres privadas de liberdade no sistema prisional, independente de etnia, classe social e gênero, na pandemia da COVID-19, ancorada nos pressupostos de Boaventura de Souza e literatura pertinente sobre a pandemia da COVID-19. Especialmente, no âmbito brasileiro, diante do engajamento limitado e, por vezes, uma gestão ineficiente, torna-se inadiável lançar alternativas, no que tece aos cuidados às mulheres privadas de liberdade no sistema prisional, incluídas duplamente no grupo de elevada vulnerabilidade e invisibilidade social. A mulher privada de liberdade, para além do delito cometido, continua a viver como ser humano, com singularidades e potencialidades, no contexto da pandemia da COVID-19, em duplicidade.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".