The Effectiveness of Intensive Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation in a Patient with Multiple System Atrophy – Parkinsonian Subtype: A Case Report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aims Multiple system atrophy (MSA) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder with poor prognosis. This case report presents the first interdisciplinary rehabilitation program for a patient with the Parkinsonian subtype of MSA (MSA-P).Methods A 68-year-old male who was diagnosed with clinically probable MSA-P was transferred to a Canadian-based rehabilitation center. He participated in an intensive interdisciplinary program over 36 days, with goal-directed rehabilitation from a physiotherapist, occupational therapist, and speech language pathologist, including remediation, compensation and education.Results From admission to discharge, he made substantial improvements in Berg Balance Scale (BBS) score (14/56 to 30/56), Functional Independence Measure (FIM) score (61 to 75), dominant hand dexterity, communication, and development of safe swallowing strategies.Conclusion This case supports a short-term, intensive-based interdisciplinary approach for the MSA-P population to provide educational value to patients and their caregivers, to develop compensation strategies, and to achieve functional improvement which translates to community living.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".