MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392478767 · doi:10.1161/svin.03.suppl_2.168

Abstract 168: Platelet function testing and risk of periprocedural complications with flow diversion: An international multicenter study

2023· article· en· W4392478767 on OpenAlexaff
Justin E. Vranic, Adam A. Dmytriw, Inka K. Berglar, Naif M. Alotaibi, Nicole M Cancelliere, Christopher J. Stapleton, James D. Rabinov, Pablo Harker, Rajiv Gupta, Matthew J. Koch, Scott B. Raymond, Justin Mascitelli, T. Masoud Patterson, Kareem El Namaani, Anna Luisa Kühn, Bryan Pukenas, Brian T. Jankowitz, J Burkhardt, Adnan H. Siddiqui, Pascal Jabbour, Jasmeet Singh, Ajit S Puri, Robert W. Regenhardt, Vítor Mendes Pereira, Aman B. Patel

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke Vascular and Interventional Neurology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeripheral Artery Disease Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMulticenter studyFunction (biology)Intensive care medicineInternal medicineCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is necessary to minimize the risk of periprocedural thromboembolic complications associated with aneurysm embolization using Pipeline embolization device (PED). We sought to assess the impact of platelet function testing (PFT) on reducing periprocedural thromboembolic complications associated with PED flow diversion in patients receiving aspirin and clopidogrel. Methods Patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms requiring PED flow diversion were identified from 13 centers for retrospective evaluation. Clinical variables including the results of PFT prior to treatment, periprocedural DAPT regimen, and intracranial complications occurring within 72‐hours of embolization were identified from the medical record. Complication rates were compared between PFT and non‐PFT groups. Differences between groups were tested for statistical significance using the Wilcoxon rank sum, Fisher exact, or Chi‐square tests. A p‐value <0.05 was statistically significant. Results 580 patients underwent PED embolization with 262 patients dichotomized to the PFT group and 318 patients to the non‐PFT group. 13.7% of PFT group patients were clopidogrel non‐responders requiring changes in their pre‐embolization DAPT regimen. 5% of PFT group patients experienced thromboembolic complications versus 1.6% of patients in the non‐PFT group (p=0.019). Two (15.4%) PFT group patients with thromboembolic complications experienced permanent neurological disability versus 4 (80%) non‐PFT group patients. 2.2% of PFT group patients and 3.5% of non‐PFT group patients experienced hemorrhagic intracranial complications (p>0.9). Conclusion Pre‐procedural PFT prior to PED treatment of intracranial aneurysms in patients pre‐medicated with an aspirin and clopidogrel DAPT regimen may not be necessary to significantly reduce the risk of procedure‐related intracranial complications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke Vascular and Interventional NeurologySame topicPeripheral Artery Disease ManagementFrench-language works237,207