MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392507890 · doi:10.1353/cat.2023.a907477

The Shattered Cross: French Catholic Missionaries on the Mississippi River, 1698–1725 by Linda Carol Jones (review)

2023· article· en· W4392507890 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Carole Blackburn

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œCatholic historical review · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicColonialism, slavery, and trade
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoryGenealogy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Shattered Cross: French Catholic Missionaries on the Mississippi River, 1698–1725 by Linda Carol Jones Carole Blackburn The Shattered Cross: French Catholic Missionaries on the Mississippi River, 1698–1725. By Linda Carol Jones. (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press. 2020. Pp. xiv, 297. $50.00 ISBN: 978–0–8071–7356–5.) In The Shattered Cross author Linda Carol Jones shines a light on the missionary work of the Séminaire de Québec in the Mississippi River Valley at the beginning of the eighteenth century. Between 1698 and 1725 five seminary priests embarked on missions among the people of the Taensas, Tamarois, Tunica, Natchez and Quapaw nations. These missions resulted in little in the way of conversion to Christianity. While conversions were few Jones argues that some of the priests managed to find a degree of cultural understanding, approaching a middle ground, with their Indigenous hosts. The Shattered Cross is a well written and important addition to our understanding of Christian missions in New France. Jones' primary source materials are archives located in France, Canada, and Italy, with a focus on the archives of the Séminaire de Québec. These include private letters between the priests and their leadership, supply lists, discussions of administrative matters and frank depictions of the conditions of the missions that together provide unique insight into the motivations of the priests and the challenges they faced as they descended the Mississippi. The missions were not well planned or adequately funded. Fathers Antoine Davion, François de Montigny, Jean-François Buisson de Saint-Cosme, Nicolas Foucault and Marc Bergier struggled with logistical difficulties, isolation, a climate for which they were not equipped, and their inability to speak the languages of their Indigenous interlocutors. In the case of the Tamarois they were also in direct competition with the Jesuits. Fathers Foucault and Saint-Cosme were killed in the field, Father de Montigny left for France after twelve months, and Bergier succumbed to disease in a few short years. Father Davion alone remained along the Mississippi for 25 years before returning to France. While Jones uses the archives to excellent effect in the retelling of the main events of these missions the book is not able to paint as full a picture of the Indigenous peoples the missionaries lived among. As she notes, "we know very little about the interactions that took place between Seminary missionaries and Native peoples along the Mississippi during the early part of the eighteenth century" (p. 228). Jones relies on the work of historians, anthropologists and other secondary sources to frame the cultural contexts in which the priests found themselves. This is a large task. Jones also draws on Richard White's The Middle Ground: Indians, Empires and Republics in the Great Lakes Region, 1650–1815 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991) [End Page 621] with its concept of the middle ground to characterize the accommodations she suggests occurred between some of the priests and their Indigenous hosts. This is where the book is least convincing. White used the middle ground to characterize what happens when "diverse peoples adjust their differences through what amounts to a process of creative, and often expedient, misunderstandings" (White, p. xii). Not all accommodations to the 'customs of the country' amount to a middle ground. That aside, Jones's emphasis on the transformative potential of attempts to bridge cultural differences in contact zones is an important theme throughout her analysis of these missions and enhances the contribution of this book. Carole Blackburn University of British Columbia Copyright © 2023 The Catholic University of America Press

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.156

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œCatholic historical reviewSame topicColonialism, slavery, and tradeFrench-language works237,207